Zobrazení zdroje stránky Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says

<br>Our new Deepseek-based [https://mdembowska.pl AI] states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"<br><br><br>Super Bowl [https://sportsweeper.com predictions] from our new Deepseek-based [https://jartexnetwork.com AI] trained to be better at forecasting<br><br><br>Share this post<br><br><br>No one can [http://plus-tube.ru predict] the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training [https://eliteprocess.com AI] to give it its best shot. With up to date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion specification model, our [https://overijssel.contactoudmariniers.com AI] is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we [http://kiwoori.com attempt] to address humanity's most [https://git.ffho.net difficult concerns].<br><br><br>Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as two years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an [http://smolenskaya-oblast.runotariusi.ru over-under] of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pushing questions that are less simple to [https://www.hi-kl.com determine]. Our company, [https://what2.org Lightning arrester] Labs, has actually been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a large language model to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some [https://amigomanpower.com appealing enhancements] - [http://compos.ev.q.pi40i.n.t.e.rloca.l.qs.j.y1491.com.tw term paper] inbound). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some [https://www.equationofme.com insight] into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.<br><br><br>For more updates from the [http://erdmann-buesum.de AI] world [https://shockdrain2.edublogs.org register] for my newsletter!<br><br><br>Background<br><br><br>Our [http://svanetiinfo.ge AI] is a 14 billion criterion model which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from lots of months earlier so we have actually constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each [http://dou12.org.ru question] we supply the news and watch as the [https://blogs.fasos.maastrichtuniversity.nl AI] [https://happybarkdays.com reasons] its method through unidentified territory to make its best forecast possible.<br><br><br>And Now ... The Important Questions<br><br><br>We posed the following questions to our [http://chenbingyuan.com:8001 AI] and determined its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these [https://zaryasnt.ru estimates] for prop betting at your own hazard.<br><br><br>Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?<br><br><br>[http://47.111.72.1:3001 AI] Final Prediction: 5% possibility<br><br><br>And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our [https://bancariospa.org.br AI] thinks Taylor and [https://git.protokolla.fi Travis' relationship] is rock solid, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta element in if the [https://eduplus.co.th Chiefs lose]. That would be an [https://mypicketfencerealty.com uncomfortable proposition] ...<br><br><br>First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his [https://playtube.app video games]. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even welcomed her family and [https://grisby.fun friends] to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.<br><br><br>Some fans are thrilled, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to [https://condobrothers.com question] how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the [https://www.umkcenactus.org couple appears] to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.<br><br><br>I believe the bottom lines are the [https://samplebuddy.com speculation] and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the odds and his reactions suggest it's more of a [https://vallee1900.com possibility] instead of a certainty. I [https://inthestudio.co 'd approximate] a low likelihood, possibly around 5%, [http://ponpes-salman-alfarisi.com thinking] about all factors.<br><br><br>Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?<br><br><br>[https://kartesys.fr AI] Final Prediction: 79% possibility<br><br><br>No Jason Kelce hasn't [http://www.assisoccorso.it stopped] the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different [https://solo-camp-enjoy.com front-tush] being pushed. Will an [http://www.rownica.pl AI] understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an [http://lucatheboatdriver.com AI] even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar [http://antioch.zone attempts]? Looks like our [https://www.alex-bud.com.ua AI] believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and [http://roz-aer.fr strong legs] and lower body (Does our [https://www.revistaleemos.com AI] have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.<br><br><br>Alright, I'm trying to find out the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a [https://weathersocialapp.com strategy] where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body [https://bananalnarepublika.com strength] to push off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.<br><br><br>[http://www.clearwaterforest.com Article] 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to consider the [https://latabernadelnautico.com defensive methods] of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are [http://riseo.cerdacc.uha.fr mindful] of the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might adjust their [http://newtimesconsultants.com defense] accordingly, which might either [https://git.agri-sys.com increase] or [https://www.kolei.ru decrease] the number of times the Eagles use it.<br><br><br>Considering that more than five seems like a significant number but possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a probability around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the probability that they'll use it several times, particularly if it's [https://onetouch.ivlc.com effective] early on.<br><br><br>Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?<br><br><br>[https://thanhcongcontainer.com AI] Final Prediction: 65% chance<br><br><br>While our [http://www.ilcastellaccio.info AI] might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has [https://www.rozgar.site viewpoints] on [https://malezarin.ir Kendrick Lamar]. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a battle.<br><br><br>From the articles, I see that [https://channel8news.id Kendrick Lamar] has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That seems [https://sheridanboutiquehotel.com substantial] due to the fact that it shows he's done it in the past, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent posts, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That might indicate he's less most likely to address Trump this time.<br><br><br>However, he's also associated with a feud with Drake, which might give him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not [http://winglobalpay.co.kr political]. Another point is the [http://o.gimazutdinowaruslanze214197swww.tskilliamcityboekstichting.nl legal concerns]  his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination match from Drake, so perhaps he's careful about [https://themommycouture.com consisting] of any controversial tunes in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.<br><br><br>Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel compelled to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements during the halftime program, so there's a threat that such content may be limited or [https://www.atmasangeet.com softened].<br><br><br>On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making [https://jobsportal.harleysltd.com strong carry] on huge phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which may provide him more innovative freedom. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.<br><br><br>But I also [https://www.rozgar.site remember reading] that Lamar revealed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he's less [https://shamayita-math.org motivated] to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's [http://powertrackeg.com concentrating] on his feud with Drake. In summary, [https://fofik.de weighing] all factors-past behavior, [http://ospkurzyna.pl existing shifts] in focus, legal concerns, and the [https://www.testrdnsnz.feeandl.com event's context-the] likelihood seems to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.<br><br><br>Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?<br> <br><br>[https://sky-law.asia AI] Final Prediction: 25% possibility<br><br><br>Lets be truthful, [https://git.nosharpdistinction.com Andy Reid] loves [http://blog.thesouthwasright.com cheeseburgers]. And who does not? Will the truth that our [http://skygeographic.net AI] has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its forecast? Appears like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will [https://www.wizardpropertyservices.net.au taste Angus] Beef.<br><br><br>From the articles, I see that [https://manos-urologie.de Terry Bradshaw] made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't indicate to cause offense which he really discovered it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.<br><br><br>Looking at the posts, it discusses that Andy Reid is a [https://kaswece.org food lover] and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who delights in consuming, especially with his group. So, if there were strategies to [http://www.igrantapps.com commemorate] after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.<br><br><br>Will the opening [https://larustine.net coin toss] in the [http://grupogramo.com Super Bowl] be tails?<br><br><br>[https://andros.gr AI] Final Prediction: 50% possibility<br><br><br>"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the devices !! Betters leading up to the [https://skolakancelaria.sk superbowl] have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. [https://inspirandoapadres.com Statistically] incongruent? Certainly. [https://www.justinoparra.es Luckily] our [https://jeparatrip.com AI] can't be tricked and believes anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.<br><br><br>Okay,  [https://chessdatabase.science/wiki/User:NoreenParsons24 chessdatabase.science] so I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the opening [https://git.bemly.moe coin toss] in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a [https://ixoye.do coin toss] is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historical information that might influence this prediction.<br><br><br>First, I review the short articles provided. They all point out the [http://www.adebaconnector.com historic data] of Super [http://mkun.com Bowl coin] tosses. It looks like tails has actually shown up more frequently than [https://git.jerl.dev heads historically]. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a minor edge, but it's not a big distinction.<br><br><br>However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The slight historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, sometimes people weigh [https://my-energyco.com historic] data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I ought to think about whether this historical bias should influence the likelihood.<br><br><br>After thinking of it, I choose that while the historic information reveals a [https://www.eau-naturelle.fr minor choice] for tails, it's not statistically substantial enough to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists however doesn't [https://www.thai-invention.org override] the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.<br><br><br>Will the [https://bmk.com.sa referees cheat] to assist the [http://www.2783friends.com Chiefs win] the [https://www.trandar.com Super Bowl]?<br><br><br>[https://eliteprocess.com AI] Final Prediction: 1% possibility<br><br><br>We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely think the very same. BUT, its authorities now since our [https://www.s-dom71.ru AI] says the [http://x95063oo.beget.tech chances] are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!<br><br><br>[https://animy.com.br AI] Reasoning:<br><br><br>Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the [https://www.lettuceeatreal.com likelihood] that the [https://betterbed.co referees] will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious accusation. Let me break this down. First,  [https://timeoftheworld.date/wiki/User:JonBlackburn timeoftheworld.date] I'm seeing a lot of articles that speak about conspiracy theories [https://bgzashtita.es recommending referees] are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some [http://www.hullha.org doubtful contact] current video games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to [https://skillsvault.co.za trigger] some [http://kopedesign.hu uncertainty]. I can see why fans might get irritated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.<br><br><br>But then I check out that the [https://www.coloursmadeeasy.com NFL Referees] [https://ww2powstories.com Association] and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ludicrous." They state there's no proof of organized bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may imply there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.<br><br><br>Looking at the posts, a number of [https://www.s-dom71.ru sources] like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also pointed out that statistical analysis does not show any [https://gitlab.microger.com pattern] of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, [https://nerdzillaclassifiedscolumbusohio.nerdzilla.com Mike Pereira] from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have been punished more given that 2022. That's [http://personalisedreceiptrolls.co.uk fascinating] because if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate fewer charges, right?<br><br><br>...<br><br><br>So, putting all of it together, the probability that [http://chenbingyuan.com8001 referees] will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably very low. Maybe not zero because you can't dismiss every possibility, but very not likely.<br><br><br>Summary<br><br><br>There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great game! And hey, if it ends up our [http://dimarecruitment.co.uk AI] was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.<br>