Spy Vs. AI: Porovnání verzí

Verse z 10. 2. 2025, 10:04

U.S. Diplomacy


Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading forum for serious discussion of American diplomacy and global affairs. The publication has featured contributions from numerous prominent international affairs specialists.


More Resources


- Feedback

- Institutional Subscriptions

- Gift a Subscription

- About Us

- Events

- Issue Archive

- Advertise

- Audio Content

- Account Management

- FAQs


Spy vs. AI


ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.


- More by Anne Neuberger


Spy vs. AI


How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage


Anne Neuberger


-.

Copy Link Copied.
Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai.
Copy



Gift Link Copied.
This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.



Create Citation Copied.
Chicago MLA APSA APA.
Chicago Cite not available at the minute.
MLA Cite not available at the moment.
APSA Cite not available at the minute.
APA Cite not available at the moment



Download PDF.
This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Sign in.



Request Reprint.
Request reprint permissions here.






In the early 1950s, the United States faced a critical intelligence challenge in its growing competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from World War II could no longer supply adequate intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. monitoring capabilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an adventurous moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 objectives were delivering crucial intelligence, capturing images of Soviet missile setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.


Today, the United States stands at a similar point. Competition in between Washington and its competitors over the future of the global order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should make the most of its world-class economic sector and adequate capacity for development to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence community must harness the nation's sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The integration of synthetic intelligence, especially through big language models, uses to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, enabling the shipment of faster and more relevant support to decisionmakers. This technological revolution includes significant drawbacks, nevertheless, specifically as adversaries make use of similar developments to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to safeguard itself from opponents who may utilize the technology for ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.


For the U.S. national security neighborhood, fulfilling the pledge and managing the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural changes and a determination to change the method agencies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while alleviating its inherent risks, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a rapidly progressing global landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the country plans to fairly and safely use AI, in compliance with its laws and values.


MORE, BETTER, FASTER


AI's capacity to change the intelligence community lies in its ability to procedure and analyze vast amounts of data at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to analyze large amounts of gathered information to generate time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services could leverage AI systems' pattern recognition capabilities to identify and alert human analysts to possible risks, such as missile launches or military motions, or essential international developments that experts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would make sure that crucial warnings are prompt, actionable, and relevant, enabling more efficient reactions to both quickly emerging risks and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which incorporate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For circumstances, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence could supply a detailed view of military motions, enabling quicker and more precise danger assessments and potentially new ways of providing details to policymakers.


Intelligence analysts can also offload repetitive and time-consuming tasks to devices to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: producing original and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's overall insights and performance. An excellent example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The abilities of language models have actually grown increasingly advanced and accurate-OpenAI's just recently released o1 and o3 models demonstrated significant development in accuracy and thinking ability-and can be utilized to a lot more rapidly translate and summarize text, audio, and video files.


Although challenges remain, future systems trained on greater quantities of non-English information might be capable of critical subtle distinctions between dialects and understanding the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By relying on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood could concentrate on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be tough to find, often battle to survive the clearance procedure, and take a long period of time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available throughout the right firms, U.S. intelligence services would be able to more quickly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to select the needles in the haystack that actually matter.


The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be underestimated. Models can promptly sort through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that analysts can then validate and refine, guaranteeing the end products are both detailed and precise. Analysts could team up with an innovative AI assistant to work through analytical issues, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, improving each iteration of their analyses and providing completed intelligence more quickly.


Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly got into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of files and a further 55,000 files stored on CDs, consisting of images and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials placed immense pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these specialists numerous months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to translate each page, review it by hand for pertinent material, and include that details into assessments. With today's AI abilities, the first 2 steps in that process might have been achieved within days, perhaps even hours, permitting analysts to understand code.snapstream.com and contextualize the intelligence quickly.


One of the most fascinating applications is the method AI could transform how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, allowing them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would allow users to ask particular questions and get summed up, appropriate details from countless reports with source citations, assisting them make informed choices rapidly.


BRAVE NEW WORLD


Although AI uses various advantages, it also presents substantial brand-new threats, particularly as foes establish comparable technologies. China's advancements in AI, especially in computer system vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian program, it lacks personal privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit allows large-scale information collection practices that have actually yielded data sets of immense size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on large quantities of personal and behavioral information that can then be used for different purposes, such as monitoring and social control. The existence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software application worldwide might provide China with ready access to bulk information, especially bulk images that can be used to train facial recognition models, a particular concern in countries with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security neighborhood should think about how Chinese designs developed on such extensive data sets can give China a tactical advantage.


And it is not just China. The proliferation of "open source" AI designs, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly budget friendly expenses. A lot of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are using large language models to quickly generate and spread false and harmful material or to perform cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share a few of their AI breakthroughs with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, thereby increasing the hazard to the United States and its allies.


The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI designs will end up being appealing targets for adversaries. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being important national assets that should be safeguarded against adversaries seeking to compromise or manipulate them. The intelligence neighborhood must invest in establishing secure AI designs and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and continuous assessment to safeguard against possible dangers. These teams can use AI to imitate attacks, discovering prospective weaknesses and developing techniques to reduce them. Proactive measures, including cooperation with allies on and investment in counter-AI innovations, will be necessary.


THE NEW NORMAL


These obstacles can not be wanted away. Waiting too wish for AI innovations to totally mature brings its own threats; U.S. intelligence capacities will fall back those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going complete steam ahead in establishing AI. To make sure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive warnings or longer-term tactical insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence community needs to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services must quickly master the use of AI technologies and make AI a fundamental element in their work. This is the only sure method to make sure that future U.S. presidents get the very best possible intelligence support, remain ahead of their enemies, and protect the United States' sensitive capabilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will require a cultural shift within the intelligence neighborhood. Today, intelligence analysts mainly build products from raw intelligence and data, with some assistance from existing AI models for voice and imagery analysis. Moving forward, intelligence authorities ought to check out including a hybrid method, in line with existing laws, utilizing AI models trained on unclassified commercially available information and fine-tuned with categorized details. This amalgam of innovation and traditional intelligence gathering could result in an AI entity offering direction to imagery, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of typical and anomalous activity, automated imagery analysis, and automatic voice translation.


To speed up the transition, intelligence leaders must champion the advantages of AI combination, highlighting the enhanced capabilities and efficiency it provides. The cadre of newly selected chief AI officers has been established in U.S. intelligence and defense to act as leads within their agencies for promoting AI innovation and getting rid of barriers to the technology's implementation. Pilot jobs and early wins can construct momentum and confidence in AI's abilities, encouraging more comprehensive adoption. These officers can take advantage of the knowledge of nationwide labs and other partners to test and improve AI designs, ensuring their effectiveness and security. To institutionalize change, leaders should create other organizational incentives, including promotions and training chances, to reward innovative approaches and those staff members and units that show effective use of AI.


The White House has developed the policy required for using AI in national security firms. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order relating to safe, safe, and reliable AI detailed the guidance required to fairly and securely use the innovation, and National Security Memorandum 25, released in October 2024, yogicentral.science is the nation's foundational technique for utilizing the power and managing the risks of AI to advance national security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are required for departments and firms to create the facilities needed for development and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to invest in examination abilities to make sure that the United States is building trusted and high-performing AI technologies.


Intelligence and military communities are committed to keeping people at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have produced the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will need guidelines for how their experts ought to use AI designs to make certain that intelligence products fulfill the intelligence neighborhood's requirements for dependability. The government will also require to maintain clear assistance for managing the information of U.S. residents when it pertains to the training and usage of big language models. It will be necessary to stabilize making use of emerging technologies with protecting the personal privacy and civil liberties of citizens. This means enhancing oversight systems, updating relevant frameworks to reflect the capabilities and threats of AI, and fostering a culture of AI advancement within the nationwide security device that harnesses the potential of the technology while safeguarding the rights and liberties that are fundamental to American society.


Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite images by developing a lot of the crucial innovations itself, winning the AI race will require that community to reimagine how it partners with private market. The personal sector, which is the main methods through which the government can realize AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research, data centers, and calculating power. Given those business' developments, intelligence firms must focus on leveraging commercially available AI designs and fine-tuning them with categorized data. This method allows the intelligence neighborhood to rapidly broaden its abilities without needing to begin from scratch, king-wifi.win permitting it to remain competitive with enemies. A recent collaboration in between NASA and IBM to create the world's biggest geospatial structure model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI neighborhood as an open-source project-is an exemplary presentation of how this kind of public-private partnership can operate in practice.


As the nationwide security community integrates AI into its work, it must make sure the security and resilience of its models. Establishing standards to deploy generative AI securely is crucial for maintaining the stability of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's brand-new AI Security Center and its cooperation with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.


As the United States deals with growing rivalry to form the future of the international order, smfsimple.com it is immediate that its intelligence companies and military capitalize on the country's innovation and leadership in AI, focusing especially on big language models, to supply faster and securityholes.science more appropriate details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight required to navigate a more intricate, competitive, and content-rich world.