Our New Deepseek-based AI Says
Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"
Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting
Share this post
No one can forecast the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to offer it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little but feisty 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly predicting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to answer mankind's most difficult questions.
Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pressing concerns that are less simple to select. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at anticipating the future (and have seen some interesting improvements - term paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.
For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!
Background
Our AI is a 14 billion specification design which is really on the smaller side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months earlier so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown area to make its finest prediction possible.
And Now ... The Important Questions
We posed the following concerns to our AI and wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de determined its response. While we have seen forecast improvements from our training, use these estimates for prop wagering at your own peril.
Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity
And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...
First, I'll look at the key points from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her good friends and family to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.
Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not attending to the speculation straight.
I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the chances and his actions recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, considering all elements.
Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the very bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity
No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.
Alright, I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it seems like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.
Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to perform the move. The article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. ... I likewise require to consider the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they may adjust their defense appropriately, which might either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.
Considering that more than 5 seems like a considerable number but possible offered their self-confidence, I would estimate a possibility around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, users.atw.hu and the likelihood that they'll utilize it a number of times, particularly if it works early on.
Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?
AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity
While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.
From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration during a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That seems substantial since it reveals he's done it before, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current short articles, koha-community.cz it points out that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might mean he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.
However, he's likewise involved in a feud with Drake, which may provide him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination fit from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about including any questionable tunes in the performance. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he may still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.
Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, forum.altaycoins.com which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar may feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations during the halftime program, so there's a risk that such content might be limited or .
On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong carry on big stages. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which may provide him more creative liberty. Plus, his previous behavior recommends he's not shy about revealing his opinions, even in public efficiencies.
But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the possibility seems to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.
Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility
Lets be truthful, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of a chance that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.
From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't suggest to trigger offense which he actually found it funny himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.
Taking a look at the short articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's a short article specifically about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who takes pleasure in eating, wikitravel.org particularly with his group. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.
Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?
AI Final Prediction: 50% chance
"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and bytes-the-dust.com 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and believes anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historic data that may influence this prediction.
First, I check out the articles offered. They all mention the historical statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has turned up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a big distinction.
However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is generally considered random. The small historical edge for tails could be due to opportunity. But when making predictions, sometimes individuals weigh historical data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I need to consider whether this historic predisposition should influence the probability.
After thinking about it, I decide that while the historical data reveals a small preference for tails, it's not statistically considerable enough to move the probability far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists but does not override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.
Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 1% chance
We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably believe the same. BUT, its official now since our AI says the chances are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and wiki.whenparked.com square!
AI Reasoning:
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the probability that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of short articles that talk about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful calls in current video games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does appear to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.
But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ludicrous." They state there's no evidence of methodical predisposition. That's a strong declaration from the individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might suggest there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.
Looking at the short articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis doesn't show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have been penalized more since 2022. That's interesting due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate fewer penalties, right?
...
So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero because you can't rule out every possibility, but extremely not likely.
Summary
There you have it everybody, is it even worth enjoying the game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the video game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.
