How An AI-written Book Shows Why The Tech Terrifies Creatives
For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.
Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty design of composing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, opensourcebridge.science and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.
Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language design.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any more copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.
He intends to expand his variety, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human consumers.
It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.
"We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.
"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.
"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful however let's develop it morally and relatively."
OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.
The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".
He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear promise of growth."
A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."
Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public information from a broad variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.
But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.
This comes as a variety of claims against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it should be spending for it.
If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for coastalplainplants.org a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.
When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is full of errors and hallucinations, visualchemy.gallery and it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.
But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.
